Student Learning: A 21st Century Sci-Fi E-book

Googling.jpg

Remember when? This pic showed up in my Facebook feed this morning and it sent waves of terrifying flashbacks through me.  Incidentally, my mother was a school librarian, so you can imagine.  My heart started to race, my eyes opened wide...well maybe that was the coffee.  Either way, this is the form of "Googling" that I grew up with.  In fact, I immediately Googled card catalog images... and wished that I hadn't...back to the photo.  The reference card the girl in the picture picks up will most likely lead her to a book or research article with outdated information based on research carried out in a similar fashion. There will be no rapid connections made pointing her in new directions without opening a new drawer and sifting through a stream of unrelated or outdated resource references.  When I think about how I access information today, it doesn't even compare.  Imagine if the girl in the photo found out that within a couple of minutes, she could sift through endless volumes of current, relevant information, and contact experts across the globe to learn the information that she seeks without ever leaving her computer or picking up her land line phone.  At best it would be the makings of a great sci-fi tale, a Farenheit 451 or 1984 if you will.  Though this futuristic account of card catalogs would be frightening indeed, imagine if the situation were reversed and the sci-fi novel told a decidedly harrier tale, the disappearance of the Internet as we know it and a return to card catalogs and geographical isolation.   

This made me think about how we structure learning for our students.  ​In my last post about problem finders, I talked about Ewan McIntosh's design thinking school, NoTosh.  In his blog post about problem finders, Ewan states, " Teachers, for too long, have actually been doing the richest work of learning for their students. Teachers find problems, frame them and the resources young people can use to solve them. Young people get a sliver of learning from coming up with ideas, based on some basic principles upon which the teacher has briefed them, and the teacher then comes back on the scene to run the whole feedback procedure." 

Now I am going to make the assumption that all of you reading this blog exist on the tech savvy side of the learning continuum.  You are after all reading blogs on the Internet, and some of you were directed here from some form of social media or RSS feed.  As a teacher, do you define your own problems or does someone else find them for you?  Does someone else supply you with your resources for learning or do you discover them on your own? 

When asked why we do so much of the legwork for our students in terms of finding and framing problems and identifying resources, we usually respond that we don't have enough time, or they aren't good at it.  If that is the case, then isn't that the one skill that we SHOULD be teaching our students ?  As teachers, we need to reprogram our card catalog habits.  I propose that we write our own sci-fi novel; one where students are empowered to discover, research, and solve problems through prototyping using their special powers of information fluency and critical thinking.  

SPOILER ALERT:  In the end, these superheroes reverse global warming, cure cancer along with a host of terrifying diseases, bring peace to the Middle East, and force Justin Bieber and boy bands into obsolescence.  Well at least that is what would happen if I was the author. 

On that note, it is spring break and I am going to give this disappearing Internet fantasy a go! ​

21st Century Magic 8 Ball: Knowledgeable Networkers Part III

Screenshot 3-10-13 10-33 AM.jpeg

For the past week I have been living vicariously through the twitter feeds of those attending SXSWedu in Austin, TX.  Today, Melissa Greenwood wrote about What's Changing in Education for Smart Blog.  The first item in her list was Teach Students to Find the Answers.  Alan November told attendees in his session entitled Creating a New Culture of Teaching and Learning that 100% of questions that students ask teachers are Google-able.  He goes on to say that educators must become learning facilitators, teaching students, among other things, how to create solid queries for online research and use the technology and tools available to them. 

We can no longer function as the Magic 8 Ball for our students.  It is time to throw out the standard responses, and change our Magic 8 Ball rhetoric that we use with students.   ​

Last night I received a message from a former student who is taking a biology course at the moment. ​

Student:  Ms. Newcomb at the end of the ETC why does oxygen have to be the final acceptor of electrons?​  (Definitely Google-able)

Me:  (answered a question with a question) 

Student:​ (continuing to bombard me with Google-able questions, then has a thought) Maybe that's why evolutionary oxygen was the most efficient option.

Me:  It would be interesting is to look into the evolution of the ETC. If you think about it, when life began, theoretically there was only anaerobic bacteria. How did those organisms transform energy? Then the photosynthetic bacteria evolved and started to produce O2…which lead to the oxygen catastrophe. So theoretically, it could have been somewhere in this time period when eukaroytic organisms evolved alongside of the increased production of O2 that these mechanisms would have come about. Look it up and let me know what you find!​

Student:  That's awesome and makes so much sense and I definitely will.  One site is saying that it is only because oxygen has a great electronegativity. The only substance with a greater electronegativity is fluorine which is poisonous.

This conversation would have gone differently had I simply answered his question.  Instead, my magic 8 ball response was, "Better not tell you now".  This approach helped him to refocus his questions and pointed him in the direction of other research possibilities. 

I woke up this morning to a message containing a series of links that attempt to answer the evolutionary origins of aerobic respiration.  One peaked my interest.  ​In the article, Evolution of energetic metabolism: the respiration-early hypothesis, the abstract states: 

Other molecular data predict that this ancestor was unlikely to perform oxygenic photosynthesis. This evidence, that aerobic respiration has a single origin and may have evolved before oxygen was released to the atmosphere by photosynthetic organisms, is contrary to the textbook viewpoint.

Textbooks can be wrong???​  :-)

21st Century Magic 8 Ball response suggestion #1:  I don't know.  Why don't you find out and share what you learn with the class? 

I do this frequently in class even if I know the answer.  The other day, we were discussing the mechanisms of movement at a molecular level.  ​

Student:  Your heart is a muscle that is constantly contracting.  Why doesn't it ever get tired?  ​(Google-able question)

21st Century Magic 8 Ball response: I don't know.  Why don't you find out and share what you learn with the class?  ​

Student post to class Facebook group:  ​

Screenshot 3:10:13 11:10 AM-2.jpeg

In case you are curious, here is the link.  Which brings me to my question for you.  What suggestions do you have for the revised 21st Century Magic 8 Ball?   While you ponder that, I am off to research this obscure hypothesis from 1995 that could very well turn everything that we think we know about the evolution of aerobic respiration upside down...or not.

Knowledgeable Networkers Part I                Knowledgeable Networkers Part II               

Comment
Share